Skip to main content

Not making the grade

In the odd beast that is the Princeton short-term semester, students take one class three hours a day, every day, for three weeks (in fact, the total class hours are greater than the 10-week long term). After spending the past year learning the basics of Hebrew grammar, I was hoping to take a Hebrew exegesis class, but none were offered. Instead, I took 2 Corinthians, which I knew would entail reading the letter in the original Greek. I had taken Greek the previous summer, which was like the short term stretched over 8 weeks--3 hours of class every day for eight weeks. Verb tenses and vocabulary were feverishly memorized each day and--more often than not--just as quickly forgotten. Even though I took a Greek exegesis class in the fall to help retain the Greek I had learned, the class emphasized exegesis over grammar, and I felt my grasp of Greek slipping through my fingers like so many grains of sand.

All of this serves as preface to say that I was less than confident about my ability to do well on the daily Greek grammar and translation quizzes that were listed in the syllabus for the 2 Corinthians class and that constituted 30% of the grade. Another 30% would come from a group project, and group projects are always dicey for closet control freaks like me. And so I opted to take the class pass/fail and free myself of the stress of laboring for the all-important A.

However, despite not taking the class for a letter grade, I didn't work any less. I spent an entire Saturday writing my exegetical paper; I studied for the quizzes as intently as I would have if taking them for a grade; and I took an active role in putting together the group project. The fruit of all my labors was a shiny red P on my transcript, which stands for putz, I think--no, that would be Hebrew, or Yiddish. But like a putz is how I felt for having robbed myself of what would have been an A.

And then I took a deep breath--or several, I think I may have been hyperventilating--and prayed to be brought to my senses. In a high-pressured academic environment it's so easy to fall into the temptation of defining yourself by your grades. I know that I do it all the time, and I have no desire to go on to further studies, so it's not as though I need to excel to get into the best PhD programs. Who am I trying to impress? That's a rhetorical question; you needn't respond.

The same principle applies when I'm out running. I always bring my phone, which has the Endomondo app that keeps track of my time, distance, pace, etc. With Endomondo I can measure myself against myself to see how much faster or further I ran against previous runs. Although I carry a phone, it might as well be a ball and chain because I'm a prisoner to it. I hadn't realized that until just last week. I was about three miles into a five-mile run when the app suddenly reset. I stopped my run and restarted the app from where it had stopped, thinking that I would add the two runs together and still be able to calculate my distance. After I took a few steps the app reset yet again. Cursing under my breath--okay, not so much under my breath--I restrained myself from hurling the phone like a discus over Tenafly Road. And then I had to laugh because I remembered that earlier in the run I had said a very brief, impromptu prayer to be set free from obsessing over the scarlet P I felt I was wearing on my forehead (oh that it were a scarlet A!).

And here was the answer to that prayer. "Shut up and run," I felt I was being told. Don't worry about the destination, be it a grade or a time to beat, and just enjoy the journey. Maybe you'll actually learn something in the process. You don't need to keep score by measuring yourself against other golfers. Okay, I added that last sentence just so I could link to this:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SERMON: The Great Omission (Mt. 28:16-20)

This sermon was delivered at Yale Divinity School in 2020 for the class Sacred Moments in African-American Preaching. I begin with a simple observation. Of the four canonical gospels, Matthew is the only one that ends with the words of Jesus. Mark, Luke, and John all end in the narrator’s voice, but Matthew closes with the words of Jesus. Mark ends at the tomb, with the women fleeing in terror and amazement. Luke ends with the disciples in Jerusalem, praising at the temple. John ends on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias, with a dialogue between Jesus and Peter. And here Matthew ends with the disciples in Galilee, meeting Jesus at the mountain where he had directed them.                Matthew gives Jesus the last word. But before we get to those last words, there are three other words in this passage that I call to our attention because I find them astonishing. Let me read verse 17 once more. “When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some do...

Where have I been?

What a presumptuous question! But this is a blog, after all, and presumably someone is reading it--that's what the blog's statistics indicate, anyway. I haven't posted at all since Christmas because during my two weeks "off" for Christmas break I: prepared the children's Christmas sermon with my pastoral partner, Dan Yang; wrote the senior high curriculum for the winter youth group retreat; and prepared a seminar for the retreat on the Old Testament. All that took place the first week. The second week was spent at the retreat, from which I got back just in time for the New Year's service. So going back to school on January 3 was actually a welcome break from my break. Since I've been back on campus I've been immersed in my readings for Christianity's Cultured Critics, my course for the fall short term. The readings are not light (Hume, Kant, Schleiermacher, etc.), and I have to keep a daily critical log and prepare a group project for the l...

Unappetizer

Every Tuesday the pastors here go out for lunch together. Yesterday we visited a restaurant owned by a church member. The restaurant's specialty is a dish known as boshintang (보신탕), which is...well...dog stew. I thought that eating dog "meat" was confined to the more rural areas of Korea, but this restaurant was in the middle of Gangnam, one of the busiest districts of Seoul. Bottom line--no, I did not partake--the restaurant offered other dishes. Only a particular type of dog is raised for its "meat," or so I've read. In Korean they are called nureongi (누렁이), which is slang for "yellow one." They are mid-sized spitz-type dogs that look a lot like the Jindo, a dog native to Korea that Koreans revere for its intelligence and loyalty. Dog ownership is becoming quite common in Seoul, especially among younger Koreans, so I hope that Koreans find it increasingly difficult to distinguish dogs that sit on a couch from those that sit on a plate. ...