Skip to main content

And indentity

I'm not a regular poetry reader, at least not since I finished my last literature class in undergrad. Yet every autumn I find myself turning to one of my poetry anthologies. Autumn is somehow conducive to reflection. As the leaves, like fireworks, explode in color and then quietly fade, and the cool air pushes summer into memory, I want to turn back the pages of my memory as though flipping through a well-worn photo album.

The particular poem I have in mind is one with which you're probably familiar: O Me, O Life! by Walt Whitman. If you've seen Dead Poets Society--and it's one of my favorite films--it's the poem that Robin Williams recites just after he has the students shred the introduction of their poetry textbooks. He crouches in the center of the classroom and has the students huddle around him as he shares with them his love of language.


For the past few weeks I have found myself pondering the answer to that question, "What good amid these, O me, O life?" "Answer? That you are here--that life exists and identity." Some of the readings from my Face of the Other class have concerned identity. For the existentialist writers we've been reading, existence is relational. There is no self apart from the Other. For me that raises issues of identity. Of course, our existence is in large part relational. I identify as son, brother, husband, pastor, student, and so on and so forth, depending upon my relationship to a particular person. But isn't there a core self supporting all of the relational frameworks? To what extent do we contribute to our own identities?

In the interest of full disclosure, I ask this because a few weeks ago, two people referred to me by a title with which I have never identified myself. Both incidents occurred within a church context. A man from South Africa, with whom I was speaking after the service, referred to me as "father." That was odd on multiple levels. It was odd because pastors in the Presbyterian Church are simply "Pastor" or "Reverend so-and-so." It was odd because he was at least 20 years my senior. And it was odd because I'm still coming to terms with and living into my pastoral identity.

Shortly after speaking with him, I was sent on an errand to buy bread for communion for the installation service. If you're wondering, communion bread at Broadway is a $5 loaf of challah purchased from Morton Williams. (Buying the challah made me develop a sudden craving for French toast.) When I came out of the supermarket, a homeless woman, who regularly comes to the fellowship time after the service for a bite to eat, stopped me on the sidewalk. I had seen her several times before and she obviously recognized me. She grabbed my forearm--not in a violent manner, but to draw me closer to her--and asked for money. What gave me pause, however, was that she called me "papa." Who is "papa"? I thought afterward. "I'm John."

I didn't feel the need to address the way in which I was addressed by either the man from South Africa or the homeless woman. But it made me realize that my identity is not solely my own.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SERMON: The Great Omission (Mt. 28:16-20)

This sermon was delivered at Yale Divinity School in 2020 for the class Sacred Moments in African-American Preaching. I begin with a simple observation. Of the four canonical gospels, Matthew is the only one that ends with the words of Jesus. Mark, Luke, and John all end in the narrator’s voice, but Matthew closes with the words of Jesus. Mark ends at the tomb, with the women fleeing in terror and amazement. Luke ends with the disciples in Jerusalem, praising at the temple. John ends on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias, with a dialogue between Jesus and Peter. And here Matthew ends with the disciples in Galilee, meeting Jesus at the mountain where he had directed them.                Matthew gives Jesus the last word. But before we get to those last words, there are three other words in this passage that I call to our attention because I find them astonishing. Let me read verse 17 once more. “When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some do...

Where have I been?

What a presumptuous question! But this is a blog, after all, and presumably someone is reading it--that's what the blog's statistics indicate, anyway. I haven't posted at all since Christmas because during my two weeks "off" for Christmas break I: prepared the children's Christmas sermon with my pastoral partner, Dan Yang; wrote the senior high curriculum for the winter youth group retreat; and prepared a seminar for the retreat on the Old Testament. All that took place the first week. The second week was spent at the retreat, from which I got back just in time for the New Year's service. So going back to school on January 3 was actually a welcome break from my break. Since I've been back on campus I've been immersed in my readings for Christianity's Cultured Critics, my course for the fall short term. The readings are not light (Hume, Kant, Schleiermacher, etc.), and I have to keep a daily critical log and prepare a group project for the l...

Unappetizer

Every Tuesday the pastors here go out for lunch together. Yesterday we visited a restaurant owned by a church member. The restaurant's specialty is a dish known as boshintang (보신탕), which is...well...dog stew. I thought that eating dog "meat" was confined to the more rural areas of Korea, but this restaurant was in the middle of Gangnam, one of the busiest districts of Seoul. Bottom line--no, I did not partake--the restaurant offered other dishes. Only a particular type of dog is raised for its "meat," or so I've read. In Korean they are called nureongi (누렁이), which is slang for "yellow one." They are mid-sized spitz-type dogs that look a lot like the Jindo, a dog native to Korea that Koreans revere for its intelligence and loyalty. Dog ownership is becoming quite common in Seoul, especially among younger Koreans, so I hope that Koreans find it increasingly difficult to distinguish dogs that sit on a couch from those that sit on a plate. ...