Skip to main content

This, that, and the Other

One of the more intriguing courses offered at PTS--although so far it's been disappointing--is called The Face of the Other. The reading list is phenomenal--Sartre, Camus, Levinas, Dostoevsky--but what we've read thus far has been covered in class in only the most cursory manner. The class involves a lot of journaling and navel gazing, which I wouldn't mind if they were supported by more detailed lectures and in-class discussion. Anyway, our first assignment was to answer the question, "Who is the Other to you?"

“If there is a theme with which I am particularly concerned, it is the contemporary failure of love. I don’t mean romantic love or sexual passion, but the love that is the specific and particular recognition of one human being by another. The response by eye, and voice, and touch of two solitudes. In short, the democracy of universal vulnerability.”

The above quote is from the Bostonian poet Isabella Gardner. I first came across it in the biographical section in the back of my anthology of 20th century American poets that I read as an undergrad. The words so resonated with me that I committed them to memory then, which was 1991, and they have stayed with me to this day.

Universal vulnerability. That is the Christian’s charge, for to love our neighbor demands that we make ourselves vulnerable to her—in all of her shapes, sizes, and colors; in all of her imperfections; in all of her otherness. The Other is not the nameless, faceless mass of humanity, but the fellow seminarian with whom I share a silent ride on an otherwise empty shuttle bus (save for the driver). The Other is the woman standing alone in the middle of the fellowship hall during coffee hour who looks aloof to the point of unpleasantness, and from whom I keep my distance. The Other is that specific and particular person that God has placed in my path and whom I have chosen to ignore.

The reason for my remaining silent or turning away, no doubt, is fear—not fear in one particular sense but a multi-headed Hydra of fear: the fear of having my overture rejected; the fear of it being too eagerly accepted and then having to submit to the demands in time and energy of a new acquaintance for fear of offending her; and the amorphous and irrational fear of making myself vulnerable to the Other.

And, of course, the Other has been, is, and always will be Yankees fans.

Comments

  1. I assume you mean that the course, and not PTS, has been disappointing thus far. I'm somewhat ashamed to admit that I haven't gotten far enough in my own courses to make a decision yet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That would be a correct assumption. PTS has been a fantastic experience. What courses are you taking?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm signed up for Intro to OT, Intro to NT, Christine Doctrine, and Philosophy of Religion. Though that's only because it was potentially cheaper to sign up for all four classes, and get extensions. I've only opened the books for OT and Doctrine so far, and even that is being generous.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SERMON: The Great Omission (Mt. 28:16-20)

This sermon was delivered at Yale Divinity School in 2020 for the class Sacred Moments in African-American Preaching. I begin with a simple observation. Of the four canonical gospels, Matthew is the only one that ends with the words of Jesus. Mark, Luke, and John all end in the narrator’s voice, but Matthew closes with the words of Jesus. Mark ends at the tomb, with the women fleeing in terror and amazement. Luke ends with the disciples in Jerusalem, praising at the temple. John ends on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias, with a dialogue between Jesus and Peter. And here Matthew ends with the disciples in Galilee, meeting Jesus at the mountain where he had directed them.                Matthew gives Jesus the last word. But before we get to those last words, there are three other words in this passage that I call to our attention because I find them astonishing. Let me read verse 17 once more. “When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some do...

Where have I been?

What a presumptuous question! But this is a blog, after all, and presumably someone is reading it--that's what the blog's statistics indicate, anyway. I haven't posted at all since Christmas because during my two weeks "off" for Christmas break I: prepared the children's Christmas sermon with my pastoral partner, Dan Yang; wrote the senior high curriculum for the winter youth group retreat; and prepared a seminar for the retreat on the Old Testament. All that took place the first week. The second week was spent at the retreat, from which I got back just in time for the New Year's service. So going back to school on January 3 was actually a welcome break from my break. Since I've been back on campus I've been immersed in my readings for Christianity's Cultured Critics, my course for the fall short term. The readings are not light (Hume, Kant, Schleiermacher, etc.), and I have to keep a daily critical log and prepare a group project for the l...

Unappetizer

Every Tuesday the pastors here go out for lunch together. Yesterday we visited a restaurant owned by a church member. The restaurant's specialty is a dish known as boshintang (보신탕), which is...well...dog stew. I thought that eating dog "meat" was confined to the more rural areas of Korea, but this restaurant was in the middle of Gangnam, one of the busiest districts of Seoul. Bottom line--no, I did not partake--the restaurant offered other dishes. Only a particular type of dog is raised for its "meat," or so I've read. In Korean they are called nureongi (누렁이), which is slang for "yellow one." They are mid-sized spitz-type dogs that look a lot like the Jindo, a dog native to Korea that Koreans revere for its intelligence and loyalty. Dog ownership is becoming quite common in Seoul, especially among younger Koreans, so I hope that Koreans find it increasingly difficult to distinguish dogs that sit on a couch from those that sit on a plate. ...