Skip to main content

Disorientation

Orientation lasted two full days last Thursday and Friday and was replete with seminars, lectures, affinity groups, small groups, lunches, dinners, chapel service, too many new names and faces to remember, and lots and lots of handouts to peruse. (Aside: until recently, I thought that "peruse" meant to read casually, when it in fact means the exact opposite.)

I told my affinity group, which comprised second-career students, that since I had left work only the prior Friday, and since classes had not yet started, that I felt as though I were merely on vacation and not embarking on some crazy--albeit inspired--midlife U-turn. Conversely, knowing that come Monday morning I would not be taking an 8:30 bus into New York to get to my office, but rather an 8:30 class (Systematic Theology--ack!), I also felt a bit like the coyote in the Warner Brothers cartoons, who after chasing the road runner off a cliff, finds himself momentarily hovering in mid air before plummeting to the ground.

Meep meep.

Comments

  1. peter not touching my mac wants to write in response to this post:

    u turn or fork? ... peter chung


    ppat

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel that it's too dramatic a turn to be considered a fork. The path I was on was career-oriented, offering a good salary, benefits, and a comfortable life. I turned away from that (wisely or unwisely), and in some sense I'm now back on the road I was on 20 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  3. it hurts me to see you use the word "midlife". we should get matching sports cars (like the pastors: eugene & jay).

    ReplyDelete
  4. You own a motorcycle, don't you? Seems like you've already had your midlife crisis. As for me, a hybrid SUV is as edgy as I get automotively. Saving gas is cool!

    ReplyDelete
  5. actually one of my justifications for riding the motorcycle is to lower my carbon footprint. it gets up to 60mpg. we should start a midlife hypermilers club.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SERMON: The Great Omission (Mt. 28:16-20)

This sermon was delivered at Yale Divinity School in 2020 for the class Sacred Moments in African-American Preaching. I begin with a simple observation. Of the four canonical gospels, Matthew is the only one that ends with the words of Jesus. Mark, Luke, and John all end in the narrator’s voice, but Matthew closes with the words of Jesus. Mark ends at the tomb, with the women fleeing in terror and amazement. Luke ends with the disciples in Jerusalem, praising at the temple. John ends on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias, with a dialogue between Jesus and Peter. And here Matthew ends with the disciples in Galilee, meeting Jesus at the mountain where he had directed them.                Matthew gives Jesus the last word. But before we get to those last words, there are three other words in this passage that I call to our attention because I find them astonishing. Let me read verse 17 once more. “When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some do...

Where have I been?

What a presumptuous question! But this is a blog, after all, and presumably someone is reading it--that's what the blog's statistics indicate, anyway. I haven't posted at all since Christmas because during my two weeks "off" for Christmas break I: prepared the children's Christmas sermon with my pastoral partner, Dan Yang; wrote the senior high curriculum for the winter youth group retreat; and prepared a seminar for the retreat on the Old Testament. All that took place the first week. The second week was spent at the retreat, from which I got back just in time for the New Year's service. So going back to school on January 3 was actually a welcome break from my break. Since I've been back on campus I've been immersed in my readings for Christianity's Cultured Critics, my course for the fall short term. The readings are not light (Hume, Kant, Schleiermacher, etc.), and I have to keep a daily critical log and prepare a group project for the l...

Unappetizer

Every Tuesday the pastors here go out for lunch together. Yesterday we visited a restaurant owned by a church member. The restaurant's specialty is a dish known as boshintang (보신탕), which is...well...dog stew. I thought that eating dog "meat" was confined to the more rural areas of Korea, but this restaurant was in the middle of Gangnam, one of the busiest districts of Seoul. Bottom line--no, I did not partake--the restaurant offered other dishes. Only a particular type of dog is raised for its "meat," or so I've read. In Korean they are called nureongi (누렁이), which is slang for "yellow one." They are mid-sized spitz-type dogs that look a lot like the Jindo, a dog native to Korea that Koreans revere for its intelligence and loyalty. Dog ownership is becoming quite common in Seoul, especially among younger Koreans, so I hope that Koreans find it increasingly difficult to distinguish dogs that sit on a couch from those that sit on a plate. ...